FOURTH SUNDAY IN ORDINARY TIME, YEAR B. 31.01.2021.
Readings: Deuteronomy 18:15-20; Psalm 95; 1 Corinthians
7:32-35 and Mark 1:21-28.
TRUE AND FALSE PROPHETS AMONG GULLIBLE CHRISTIANS
In a society
where people are living in abject poverty and great difficulties like in
Nigeria, Religion, in the words of Karl Max, “Becomes the opium of the masses”
who are impatiently in search of solutions to their problems. Sometimes, when
difficult situations break us down, our sense of reasoning decreases and our
emotions increases. At this point, we become gullible and practically ready to
do anything our religious leaders tell us. In view of this, today’s liturgy
draws our attention to the true prophets of God and false prophets who are ready
to manipulate and exploit the gullible Christians. How do we know and
differentiate them?
In the first
reading, by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, Moses promised the people that
a true prophet like him will come when he said, “The Lord your God will raise up for you a prophet like me from among
you…” The Lord said to Moses, “I will
put my words in his mouth… but the prophet who presume to speak a word in my name or other gods, that prophet
shall die.” Each time we reflect on false prophets, I remember the words of
Bishop Hyacinth Egbebo MSP, who often tells his priests, “Do not tell my people the Lord said, when the Lord has not said
anything to you.” This is to guide his priests against presumption as it is
often used. The true prophet speaks for God, but the false prophets speaks
presumptuously. Little wonder Psalm 19:13 affirms, “From presumptuous sins, retrain your servants.” While it is true
that one may need to learn how to flow in the gifts of the Holy Spirit, no one
should speak presumptuously; unless he/she is assured the message is from God.
Some Christians
do not help matters in this regard. Due
to difficulties, setbacks, joblessness, childlessness, life partners or
progress/success in business and other challenges, they just want to hear only
the juicy words of the prophets. With
this, many priests and pastors are tempted to give them what they want to hear
and in return, may get some material resources from them. This is
achievable in direct or indirect manner, when they ask them to buy only the
products or articles of faith they produce, which could be in form of candles,
stickers, handkerchief, wristband, T-shirts, oil and its likes. These objects of faith are not bad in
themselves, but some motives behind it (not all) becomes questionable. The
false prophet can also go to the extent of making gullible Christians panic by
mystifying their challenges or difficulties which simple reasoning or
rationality can resolve. When
Christians are so much in search for miracle working pastors and priests than
Jesus Christ himself, then they can easily fall into the hands of false
prophets.
We may likely
ask, how do we know a presumptuous or false prophet? Simply by their accuracy.
If this is faltered, then their own discernment and ability to hear from God
are rightly called into question.
However, a true prophet can also
err when he or she looses contact with Christ, the true and ideal prophet Moses
spoke about in the first reading that God will raise among his people. Like
Moses, the prophet would command of the attention the nation, he would be
mediator between God and man and the prophet will speak God’s words. While some
thought, that John the Baptist was this prophet (Jn 1:19-20), John 6:14; Acts
3:19-26. 7:37 affirms that Jesus is this prophet.
The Gospel
according to Mark presents to us Christ as the ideal prophet, who commenced his
public ministry from Galilee where he called the first four disciples, and has
moved to the Synagogue in Capernaum, where he began to exercise his teaching
and healing ministry. Entering the Synagogue reminds us that the Synagogue was
originally a school of faith, to preserve and teach the Scripture, and to
gather people for prayers. The function of the Scribes were to read and explain
the Scripture from the Old Testament. However,
the Scribes taught in the Synagogues by simply passing down what they had
learnt in schools from the Rabbis. The more the Scribes quoted the Rabbis, the
more authoritative their teachings were thought to be. When Jesus taught in the
Synagogue, he made a difference by giving fresh interpretation and new insight
to the Scripture, teaching and quoting himself often than quoting the prophets
or Rabbis.
His teaching
made more impression that the people were astonished because he spoke with authority
as the giver of the Law, which equate him with God. In his authority, he cast
out demons and cured the man with unclean spirit, who addressed him saying, “What have you to do with us Jesus of
Nazareth? Have you come to destroy us? I know who you are, the Holy One of God.”
We can draw two lessons from this, first, the one Moses spoke of, has come to
destroy the kingdom of Satan and establish the Kingdom of God. Second, in
ancient time, knowing a person’s name was thought to provide power over the
person and so the unclean spirit tried to take advantage of this but Christ
proved too powerful by driving the evil spirit away, with authority and they
obeyed him.
The Church
continues with the teaching and healing ministry of Christ, with the authority
Christ himself has handed over to the Church. St. Paul in the second reading
helps us to understand that the teaching of the Church on religious leaders,
virginity and marriage must be upheld with undivided attention.
Peace be with
you!
Fr. Ken Dogbo,
OSJ
AMEN 🙏 that was so inspiring Fr. Thank you
ReplyDeleteMay He also bless you as you continue to enrich us with His word
Lovely homily padre may the good Lord continue to bless u and use u to spread the good news through christ our lord Amen
ReplyDelete